|
|
The legal side felt simpler after I separated site issues. For a scaffold problem, I started with the Scaffold Law question. If the accident depended on a detailed safety standard, the 241(6) side mattered more. For the issue I was sorting, I saved https://sueworkclaim.com/ next to the comp-versus-lawsuit notes. Separate from height and Code-rule issues is who knew about the condition, which raises how long it existed. A defective piece of equipment can create a different issue, especially if the safety device on the equipment did not work. I treated a comp agreement as different from the claim against another responsible party, because one accident can create both a benefits claim and a separate liability claim. I would save the notice question for cases where someone may have created the hazard. Once height, Code rules, site conditions, equipment, and notice were separated, the accident became a short list of liability issues.
|
|